| |
| 18-Mar-2006 |
Zerge: And you know it |
| 26-Feb-2006 |
alex.j.k: As far as I can tell... |
| 13-Jun-2005 |
Dan in Philly: the assumptions you used... |
| 14-Mar-2005 |
"Zerge": my equations...represent pretty much what Adam Smith said |
| 11-Dec-2004 |
John J. Weatherby (Igor): Stocks were undervalued means...prices were under CURRENT EARNINGS PER A SHARE |
| 5-Nov-2004 |
John J. Weatherby (Igor): THIS IS A LONG RUN ASSUMPTION |
| 18-Oct-2004 |
John J. Weatherby (Igor): GDP growth is linear |
| 12-Oct-2004 |
John J. Weatherby (Igor): The viewpoint used is Neo-Keynesian not Post-Keynesian |
| 5-Oct-2004 |
John J. Weatherby (Igor): That is exactly why General Equilibrium started |
| 1-Jul-2004 |
Andy F: How do you know |
| 27-Mar-2004 |
Bob Kolker: He would be drummed out |
| 7-Feb-2004 |
Mark Witte: It could be that the model is just wrong |
| 27-Sep-2003 |
Mark Witte: There is no such support... |
| 20-Aug-2003 |
Christopher Auld: That isn't what the literature...claims |
| 5-Jun-2003 |
Christopher Auld: Not that's I've checked his ludicrous arithmetic |
| 30-Jan-2003 |
Drjyyc: My guess is that you aren't capable |
| 12-Jan-2003 |
Tim Worstall: Not Limiting Myself... |
| 23-Oct-2002 |
Chris Auld: That isn't an equilibrium |
| 17-Oct-2002 |
jimt@nospam.interchange.ubc.ca: Yes I Am |
| 2-Oct-2002 |
David Friedman: Total output of the firm |
| 17-Sep-2002 |
John J. Weatherby: You are assuming... |
| 16-Jul-2002 |
John J. Weatherby: Rob uses the email address to give him a false credibility |
| 1-May-2002 |
Maximus: He changed into only a point |
| 27-Feb-2002 |
Christopher Auld: Zero sum games are uninteresting... |
| 29-Nov-2001 |
Robert A. Simon: We both know that I am not |
| 20-Jul-2001 |
Chris Auld: the handful of papers...are not well-known |
| 16-Jan-2001 |
Chris Auld: I didn't see that |
| 8-Oct-2000 |
John J. Weatherby: anit-capitalist neo-Marxism thinly vieled |
| 5-Mar-2000 |
Christopher Auld: It's pointed out... |
| 11-Feb-2000 |
Chris Auld: He needs to rebuked |
| 6-Feb-2000 |
Chris Auld: Damn, there goes your Nobel |
| 19-Jan-2000 |
Thomas Sauve: Misguided theories and disproved ideas |
| 4-Dec-1999 |
Chris Auld: Here is where the problems begin |
| 4-Nov-1999 |
Chris Auld: Either wildly out of context or is simply wrongheaded |
| 7-Oct-1999 |
Markku Stenborg: You are saying... |
| 22-May-1999 |
James McCown: Keynes wasn't very interested... |
| 15-May-1999 |
John J. Weatherby: Never heard of any of them |
| 2-Apr-1999 |
Christopher Auld: These authors deserve to be chided |
| 3-Feb-1999 |
Edward Flaherty: Just as labor theory predicts |
| 3-Feb-1999 |
Stephen Hales: I am a dictator |
| 23-Dec-1998 |
Oliver Kamm: I can assure you... |
| 17-Dec-1998 |
Shawn A. Wilson: NO ONE uses Leontieff technology |
| 25-Nov-1998 |
Shawn A. Wilson: You don't dare actually exposing your claim |
| 24-Nov-1998 |
Kelly DeRango: Robert Samuelson on Joan Robinson (two economists) |
| 25-Oct-1998 |
Steven Hales: Robert tries to force it to do mathematical tricks |
| 4-Sept-1998 |
Shawn Wilson: Because I felt like it |
| 26-May-1998 |
William B. Vogt: Partial equilibrium analysis is a special case of the general A-D model |
| 10-May-1998 |
James McCown: Your model is not robust... |
| 8-May-1998 |
Dan in Philly: a demand curve only applies to the technology in use |
| 7-Apr-1998 |
William B. Vogt: A slew of mathematical economics... |
| 18-Aug-1997 |
Markku Stenborg: ...does in no bloody way imply... |
| 28-Oct-1997 |
Steven E. Landsburg: I am very close to certain |
| 13-Feb-1997 |
Markku Stenborg: There isn't any capital in the model, or if there is... |
| 26-May-1996 |
Markku Stenborg: This is getting absurd. |
| 24-May-1996 |
Edward John Vytlacil: I have never heard of such things |
| 20-May-1996 |
Markku Stenborg: Mirowski didn't show a didly-squat. |
| 3-May-1996 |
Mark Witte: ...reswitching of labor without capital |
| 24-Apr-1996 |
Mark Witte: You're trotting out... |
| 6-Mar-1995 |
Mark Witte: I can't believe |
| 8-Feb-1995 |
Mark Witte: I really can't think of any |
| 12-Feb-1994 |
Chris Auld: I very much doubt |
| 29-Nov-1993 |
Chris Auld: Radical and post-Keynesian economists eager to preserve a labour theory of value |
| 17-Sep-1992 |
T. Scott Thompson: This model does not have anything resembling capital in it! |