> If Mark Witte had a memory, he would know the empirical observation is
> that in the U.S. economy, some goods are produced by using inputs that
> were produced themselves. If neoclassical theory is incoherent when it
> comes to modeling such an economy, the question "whether Mr. Vienneau's
> preferred models really provide a better empirical fit than do
> neoclassical models" is hardly appropriate. Some coherent model needs
> to be developed.


This is getting absurd.

(1) Are you claiming that "some goods are produced by using inputs that
were produced themselves" some how casts doubt on neoclass methodology?
On results obtained by neoclass Econ?

(2) How is neoclass Econ or methodology "incoherent"?